<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Javamancy mini &#187; iPod touch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.javamancy.com/mini/tag/ipod-touch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.javamancy.com/mini</link>
	<description>The complement to Javamancy, the Blog Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:14:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The iPhone 4</title>
		<link>http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2010/06/07/the-iphone-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2010/06/07/the-iphone-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Convergence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod touch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javamancy.com/mini/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, the numbering scheme for Apple&#8217;s [AAPL] flagship communications device has been simplified again, for the general masses. Soon, the news about the new iPhone 4, which had the hubbub earlier this year &#8220;pop up&#8221; about a lost proof-of-concept model (or was is really a prototype, when all is said and done about it?), will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2010/06/07/the-iphone-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If many of the Mac-native or even Java c&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2010/01/27/if-many-of-the-mac-native-or-even-java-c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2010/01/27/if-many-of-the-mac-native-or-even-java-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod touch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2010/01/27/if-many-of-the-mac-native-or-even-java-c/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If many of the Mac-native or even Java client apps aren&#8217;t being reassembled into iPad apps, then the market for cloud-centric Web apps may be much-much-much larger and more significant than people have previously thought. Remember when there initially wasn&#8217;t a publicly available iPhone SDK for developers to build iPhone and iPod touch apps?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2010/01/27/if-many-of-the-mac-native-or-even-java-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sure, the Android based phones have been&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2010/01/05/sure-the-android-based-phones-have-been/</link>
		<comments>http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2010/01/05/sure-the-android-based-phones-have-been/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meanderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unsorted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexus One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2010/01/05/sure-the-android-based-phones-have-been/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, the Android based phones have been out for quite some time now&#8230; But the curiosity and excitement around Google&#8217;s [GOOG] Nexus One smartphone seems to be reaching a, sort of, fever pitch. Makes you wonder whether Apple [AAPL] will have some new iPhone/iPod touch news to deliver that will take some of the shine [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2010/01/05/sure-the-android-based-phones-have-been/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPod Touch to Get Camera?</title>
		<link>http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2009/07/24/ipod-touch-to-get-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2009/07/24/ipod-touch-to-get-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod touch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javamancy.com/mini/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cult of Mac reports a rumor that perhaps Apple&#8217;s [AAPL] iPod touch and the iPod nano will be getting either a still camera or the combined still-and-video camera that recently debuted in the recent iteration of the iPhone 3GS. The story based this on images from China-based manufacturers for cases designed for the two media [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.javamancy.com/mini/2009/07/24/ipod-touch-to-get-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

