<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Javamancy &#187; CAPTCHA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.javamancy.com/blog/tag/captcha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.javamancy.com/blog</link>
	<description>Where babbling isn&#039;t just merely babbling... it&#039;s flowing through the Internet, one transaction at a time...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:43:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking About CAPTCHA&#8217;s&#8230; Briefly</title>
		<link>http://www.javamancy.com/blog/2009/07/21/thinking-about-captchas-briefly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.javamancy.com/blog/2009/07/21/thinking-about-captchas-briefly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akismet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPTCHA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javamancy.com/blog/?p=2490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Akismet folks mentioned yesterday via a post on their blog about CAPTCHA conversion rates, as discussed at the SEOmoz blog. While the very informal study done by the author of the SEOmoz blog post had a very small sampling (some statisticians may even say, &#8220;Whoa! Statistically insignificant!&#8221;), and the sampling methods were arguably questionable, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The Akismet folks <a href="http://blog.akismet.com/2009/07/20/captcha-conversion-conundrum/" target="_blank">mentioned yesterday via a post</a> on their blog about CAPTCHA conversion rates, as <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/captchas-affect-on-conversion-rates" target="_blank">discussed</a> at the SEOmoz blog. While the very informal study done by the author of the SEOmoz blog post had a very small sampling (some statisticians may even say, &#8220;Whoa! Statistically insignificant!&#8221;), and the sampling methods were arguably questionable, it nevertheless shows an attempt to quantify whether CAPTCHA&#8217;s represent a matter of greater resistance toward attracting comments, as opposed to sites which do not use them (such as <em>Javamancy</em>).</p>
<p>Good? Bad? Indifferent?</p>
<p>Most visitors tend to be indifferent toward CAPTCHA&#8217;s, until they encounter them. Then, it seems that, depending on the urgency of the topic and the fervor that they experience at the moment, the visitors may decide typing a few oddly-shaped characters into a text field&#8211; in addition to any registration info they may also have to type into other fields&#8211; is worth the effort. The problem is that, measuring the impact of the content itself against the conversion rate of the CAPTCHA&#8217;s is a bit more involved and unfortunately was not considered in the SEOmoz test. As for the 50 sites, which would address the differentiation of content-value and popularity-traffic test elements, not knowing which ones are higher point value than the others also throws into question whether the volume of submissions makes sense.</p>
<p>Still good? Or bad? Or indifferent?</p>
<p>Yep, didn&#8217;t think it mattered, either. <img src='http://www.javamancy.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If you have been relying upon CAPTCHA&#8217;s and/or their variants, you will most likely continue. If you have been &#8220;going commando&#8221; all this time, you may feel obligated to investigate further the possibility of using CAPTCHA&#8217;s or some other comment/post protection scheme. If you have incorporated CAPTCHA&#8217;s as part of a more comprehensive protection pattern, you may toy with the idea of shutting them off to see how your sites fare.</p>
<p>Remember, gentle readers: YMMV. <img src='http://www.javamancy.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<h3>N.B.</h3>
<p>Fortunately, the controversy around CAPTCHA&#8217;s is not as hotly debated/argued/stomped as, say, GPL:</p>
<ul>
<li><a style="text-decoration: none; color: #2361a1; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" title="Permanent link to Another Perspective on GPL vs. Other Open Source Licensing" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.javamancy.com/blog/2009/07/07/another-perspective-on-gpl-vs-other-open-source-licensing/">Another Perspective on GPL vs. Other Open Source Licensing</a></li>
<li><a style="text-decoration: none; color: #2361a1; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" title="Permanent link to More Definitive Statement:WordPress Themes are GPL’ed" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.javamancy.com/blog/2009/07/03/more-definitive-statementwordpress-themes-are-gpled/">More Definitive Statement:WordPress Themes are GPL’ed</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Other title candidates:</p>
<ul>
<li>Need Resistance to Your Site? Try CAPTCHA&#8217;s!</li>
<li>Ooh Boy! Shake It Up with CAPTCHA&#8217;s</li>
<li>Who Cares About CAPTCHA&#8217;s?</li>
<li>CAPTCHA&#8217;s Today, CAPTCHA&#8217;s Yesterday, CAPTCHA&#8217;s&#8230; Maybe Not Tomorrow</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.javamancy.com/blog/2009/07/21/thinking-about-captchas-briefly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

